FAIR USE NOTICE: This website contains copyrighted material in which the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, social justice issues, educational issues, etc. vital to a democracy. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this website is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this website for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticisms, comments, news reportings, teachings, scholarships, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All information contained on this website is for non-profit, educational and personal uses for exposing government corruption and fraud to the public citizenry. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
We always like to make sure that all of our published stories from people are truthful of all the facts based upon the many sources of information that we receive from the public as published. Many people are not aware even as publishers or citizens of the “Retraction Law In Florida” under Florida Statutes. We are re-posting the article below from the Citizen Media Law Project at Harvard Law School to educate publishers and citizens alike to the law.
If The Tallahassee Observer/The Tallahassee O ever accidentally misrepresents the facts based on information that we receive from our sources, we would be happy to follow the Retraction Law in Florida if we receive a letter via e-mail from anyone stating any inaccuracies provided that the statements can be proven as inaccurate for a retraction that would be warranted.
Retraction Law in Florida
Note: This page covers information specific to Florida and should be read in conjunction with the general section on retraction in the section on Correcting or Retracting Your Work After Publication which has additional information applicable to all states.
Florida has a retraction statute, Fla. Stat. § 770.02, that applies to a newspaper or periodical’s “publication” of a libel, or a “broadcast” of a slander. Although the statute does not specifically state whether it covers online publications, the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Ross v. Gore, 48 So.2d 412 (Fla. 1950) suggests that an online publisher may be covered by the statute if the publisher’s main focus is the dissemination of news.
In Ross, the plaintiff Julian Ross brought suit against publisher R.H. Gore for an allegedly defamatory editorial published in Gore’s newspaper, the Fort Lauderdale Daily News. Ross argued that the state’s retraction statute violated Florida’s constitution because it prevented him from collecting punitive damages. The court disagreed and noted that the retraction statute encouraged the free dissemination of “news” and “fair comment” in a short timeframe by not placing unreasonable restraints on the working news reporter or editor, thus preserving an important component of American democracy. In a later case, an appellate court concluded that the retraction statute applied to anyone writing for a newspaper, and based its reasoning on the need to protect the swift dissemination of news in order to inform the public of “pending matters while there is still time for public opinion to form and be felt.” Mancini v. Personalized Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc., 702 So.2d 1376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997). Both the Ross and Mancini decisions suggest that future courts may be willing to apply Florida’s retraction law to an online publication as long as the publication is dedicated to the rapid dissemination of news.
Handling Requests to Remove or Retract Material in Florida
If someone contacts you with a retraction request, you should first determine whether a retraction is warranted; review the steps under the handling a retraction request section of this guide for help in making this assessment. If you determine that a retraction is appropriate, you should follow the procedures outlined in the Florida retraction statute so that you can avail yourself of the statutory benefit of limiting potential defamation damages.
Under the Florida retraction statute:
- A plaintiff has five days to serve written notice identifying the article which contains the allegedly libelous statements and specifying the statements at issue. See Fla. Stat. § 770.01 for more information on the notice requirement.
- Once the publisher receives the retraction request, the publisher must publish the correction, apology, or retraction within:
* ten days of notice, for a daily or weekly publication; * twenty days of notice, for a semimonthly publication; * forty-five days of notice, for a monthly publication; or * the next issue, for a work published “less frequently than monthly,” as long as the plaintiff serves the notice no later than 45 days prior to such publication.
- The publisher must make a full and fair correction, apology, or retraction by placing it “in as conspicuous place and type as [the] original article.”
If you comply with these procedures after receiving a retraction request and you are found to be liable for defamation, the plaintiff’s ability to recover damages from you will be limited. He or she will be able to recover only for his or her actual economic losses and will not be able to recover general damages (e.g., loss of reputation generally) or punitive damages.
Even if your online publishing activities do not fall within the scope of Florida’s retraction statute, your willingness to correct past errors in your work will provide several benefits. It will make your work more accurate and reliable, which will increase your credibility, influence, and (hopefully) your page views. It will also diminish the likelihood of your being sued in the first place, as it might placate the potential plaintiff. Furthermore, courts and juries may find a retraction shows your good faith, which will benefit you in a defamation suit.