About these ads

Leon County Kangaroo Court Judge Judith Hawkins — All Documents From Misconduct Case Exposed! | Judge Should Be Arrested And Removed From Bench Immediately!

Judge Hawkins

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

From The Supreme Court Website Page:

(Click On Links Of All Case Documents Filed)

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Supreme Court of Florida

Briefs & Other Documents in Case No. 12-2495

If you receive a blank screen after clicking on a link below, please press the Reload or Refresh button on your browser.  This page last updated January 29, 2014.

More information about this case can be obtained from our On-Line Docket

Individual briefs and other documents in Acrobat format:

 

2014

Filed_01-27-2014_Hearing_Panel_Findings_Recommendations.pdf

Filed_01-27-2014_Final_Hearing_Transcript1.pdf

Filed_01-27-2014_Final_Hearing_Transcript2.pdf

Filed_01-27-2014_Final_Hearing_Transcript3.pdf

Filed_01-27-2014_Final_Hearing_Transcript4.pdf

Filed_01-27-2014_Final_Hearing_Transcript5.pdf

Filed_01-27-2014_Final_Hearing_Transcript6.pdf

Filed_01-27-2014_Final_Hearing_Transcript7.pdf

Filed_01-27-2014_Final_Hearing_Transcript8.pdf

Filed_01-29-2014_Order.pdf

 

2013

Filed_01-07-2013_Notice_of_Appearance.pdf

Filed_01-09-2013_JQC_Response.pdf

Filed_01-17-2013_Notice_Case_Management_Conference.pdf

Filed_01-25-2013_Order_Status_Conference.pdf

Filed_02-05-2013_JQC_Request.pdf

Filed_03-08-2013_JQC_Emergency_Motion.pdf

Filed_03-08-2013_JQC_Motion_to_Compel.pdf

Filed_03-08-2013_JQC_Motion_to_Compel2.pdf

Filed_03-11-2013_JQC_Motion_to_Compel.pdf

Filed_03-12-2013_Answer_to_Request_Documents.pdf

Filed_03-25-2013_Respondent_Amended_Answer.pdf

Filed_03-28-2013_JQC_Motion.pdf

Filed_04-01-2013_Motion_to_Compel.pdf

Filed_04-04-2013_Order_Continuing Hearing_Granting_Motion_to_Compel.pdf

Filed_04-04-2013_Notice_Cancellation_Deposition.pdf

Filed_04-09-2013_Respondents_Answer_to_Order_Status_Conference.pdf

Filed_05-06-2013_Notice_Status_Conference.pdf

Filed_06-04-2013_Notice_Status_Conference.pdf

Filed_06-10-2013_Notice_Amended_Formal_Charges.pdf

Filed_07-31-2013_Order_on_Status_Conference.pdf

Filed_08-01-2013_Answer_to_Notice_Amended_Charges.pdf

Filed_08-26-2013_Notice_of_Change_of_Hearing_Panel.pdf

Filed_09-25-2013_Order_on_Status_Conference.pdf

Filed_10-02-2013_Trial_Memo.pdf

Filed_10-03-2013_JQC_Trial_Memorandum.pdf

 

2012

Filed_12-05-2012_Formal_Charges.pdf

Filed_12-05-2012_High_Profile_Order.pdf

Filed_12-26-2012_Answer_to_Formal_Charges.pdf

 

Questions?  Contact publicinformation@flcourts.org

This webpage was automatically generated by a computer program.

Live and archived video of Court arguments is available at:

http://www.wfsu.org/gavel2gavel/

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Florida Supreme Court Docket

Case Docket

Case Number:  SC12-2495  – Active

INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, NO. 11-550 vs.  RE: JUDITH W. HAWKINS

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS

COMMISSION CASES PENDING IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

Since October 20, 2000, this page has been available on-line to quickly distribute to news media and others any documents filed with the Florida Supreme Court  in Judicial Qualifications Commission cases involving alleged misconduct by Florida state judges or involuntary retirement of a judge due to serious illness.  It does not include documents filed before this date.  More information on the JQC and how to file complaints against Florida state judges is available at the end of this document.

Pending JQC Cases Against Florida State Judges                   
Judge Filings Docket County Updated
Barry M. Cohen 12-2244 Docket Palm Beach 01-21-14
Judith Hawkins 12-2495 Docket Leon 01-29-14
Sandy Kautz 13-2262 Docket Citrus County 12-03-13
Debra Krause 13-2263 Docket Seminole County 12-05-13
Brenda T. Sheehan 14-136 Docket Hillsborough County 01-27-14
Laura Marie Watson 13-1333 Docket Broward 01-29-14

How Judges Are Disciplined for Misconduct

The Judicial Qualifications Commission is an independent agency created by the Florida Constitution solely to investigate alleged misconduct by Florida state judges.  It is not a part of the Florida Supreme Court or the state courts and operates under rules it establishes for itself.  It has its own Website.  The JQC has no authority over federal judges or judges in other states.  Complaints against state judges must be filed in writing with the JQC, not with the Supreme Court or any other state court or judge.  Neither the Supreme Court nor its Chief Justice have any authority to investigate alleged misconduct by state judges or to investigate the JQC. The JQC can be reached via the Contact Information on its website  or at at:

Judicial Qualifications Commission 1110 Thomasville Road Tallahassee, FL 32303 Phone (850) 488-1581

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How Must a Complaint be Filed?

Complaints can be filed using a Complaint Form provided by the JQC. Complaints cannot be filed with the Supreme Court, only with the JQC. For more information, check the JQC Website.

How can I check the status of a complaint I filed with the JQC?

You should contact JQC staff at the phone number or address above. The Florida Supreme Court does not have access to these records.

Can I E-mail a complaint to the JQC?

No. See the JQC’s Complaint Form for instructions.

What Are the Ethics Standards for State Judges?

The ethical standards for judges are called the Code of Judicial Conduct.  They apply to all sitting judges. Canon 7 of the Code also applies to anyone seeking judicial office, such as in an election.

How Do Investigations Begin?

The JQC can investigate complaints made by individuals, and it can investigate judges on its own initiative.  During the initial investigation, the Constitution provides that all JQC complaints, investigations, and proceedings are confidential.

When Must a Complaint be Filed?

The JQC can investigate a judge for misconduct if a complaint is filed at any time while the judge is in office and for one year afterward.

What is Involuntary Retirement?

The JQC can recommend that a judge be involuntarily retired due to serious illness that interferes with the ability to perform the duties of office. In these cases, the judge is not being accused of misconduct. Filings in these cases may be confidential under a state law protecting medical records of state employees.

Who Is on the JQC?

There are 15 Members of the JQC. Two must be district court of appeal judges chosen by all the judges of the 5 district courts. Two must be circuit court judges chosen by all the judges of the 20 judicial circuits. Two must be county court judges chosen by all the judges of the 67 county courts. Four must be registered voters who also are lawyers, chosen by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar. The final five must be non-lawyers who are registered voters, chosen by the Governor.

How Is the JQC Structured?

The JQC is divided into two panels, an “investigative panel” that acts much like a prosecutor, and a “hearing panel” that acts much like a panel of judges reviewing the case. Judges accused of misconduct often  are represented by a private attorney.

When Do Proceedings Become Public?

The Constitution specifically makes  all ethical complaints against judges confidential. Confidentiality ends only when  the JQC investigative panel files with the Supreme Court a Notice of Formal Charges.  This is a public record and is the first public announcement that a formal investigation is underway.  It is much like a finding of probable cause in a criminal investigation. However, this document alone does not give the Supreme Court any authority to commence proceedings of its own.  Until the investigative stage is complete, the Supreme Court merely acts as the custodian of public records filed with it in the pending investigation.  Any further action at this point will be undertaken by the JQC.

How Does the JQC Hold Proceedings?

The hearing panel of JQC   will review the case against the state judge and hear competing arguments from both sides.  The amount of time involved in conducting hearings varies greatly from case to case.  Some judges agree or “stipulate” to some form of discipline, which means there will be no further proceedings and the case will go on to the Supreme Court for a final decision.  However, the Supreme Court can reject these stipulations and has done so on some occasions in the past. If a judge contests the charges, more time and more hearings usually are involved.  The JQC hearing panel schedules its own hearings. These hearings are not broadcast but are open to the public. They can be held anywhere in the state, usually near where the judge lives.

When Does the Case Come to the Supreme Court?

Once the JQC panel has concluded its hearings, it files its findings and recommendation for any discipline with the Supreme Court.  If the state judge has stipulated to discipline, the stipulation also will be filed with the Court.  The Supreme Court then must decide whether to schedule oral argument.  Briefs can be filed with the Court before it decides the case.  If oral argument is scheduled, it is announced in advance in the Court’s Press Summaries, which are available on the  Court’s website.

Why Doesn’t the Supreme Court Impose Discipline as Soon as the JQC Makes Its Recommendation?

The JQC only has authority to recommend discipline. This is only a recommendation, not a final determination. Final authority to determine whether the JQC’s recommendation is legally correct rests with the Supreme Court after the parties have had a chance to make arguments according to the Rules of Procedure. This means that the parties have a right to file briefs making separate arguments to the Supreme Court unless the judge waives that right, to file appropriate motions, and to request that the Court schedule the case for oral arguments.

What Kinds of Discipline Can a Judge Receive?

Possible forms of discipline can include one or more of the following:

  • No discipline
  • A public reprimand
  • A fine
  • Suspension from office
  • Removal from office
  • Involuntary retirement due to serious illness

What Other Government Bodies Can Discipline Judges for Misconduct?

In addition to the JQC process, the Florida House of Representatives has authority to impeach judges, who then are tried for misconduct in the Florida Senate. Judges are removed from office by impeachment if found guilty by the Senate. Apart from impeachment, only the JQC can recommend forms of discipline, which must be approved by the Florida Supreme Court. There are no other methods of disciplining judges for ethical misconduct authorized by Florida law, although all Florida judges can be voted out of office in regular elections.

Can Judges Be Suspended from Office While Under Investigation for Misconduct?

Judges can be temporarily suspended from office while under investigation in only two ways. First, if a judge is impeached by the House and is awaiting trial by the Senate, an automatic suspension is imposed by the state Constitution. Second, the investigative panel of the JQC can ask the Supreme Court to suspend with or without pay while it investigates a judge.  No other governmental entities can suspend a judge from office pending an investigation.

How Can I Watch JQC Cases Before the Supreme Court?

All of the Supreme Court’s arguments are broadcast on the Internet, by satellite, and by some privately owned cable TV companies that show the Florida Channel.  Webcasts and Video Archives also are available via the Internet for free.  Videotapes of the proceedings also can be obtained from the Court’s broadcast contractor, the Florida State University Broadcast Center, by calling (850) 487-3170. Broadcasts and videotapes are only available for proceedings in the Supreme Court, not proceedings before the JQC.

Is the JQC a Part of the State Courts System Administered by the Chief Justice?

No. Article V, section 12 of the state Constitution specifically creates the JQC as a body independent of the state courts and the other branches of government. The JQC makes its own rules but is funded by the Legislature. The Supreme Court does not supervise the JQC, cannot investigate it, cannot fire or select its members, and cannot order it to perform any official act.

How can I Complain about the JQC?

Article V, section 12, of the state Constitution creates the JQC and specifies that its members who are judges can be removed through impeachment by the House of Representatives with trial in the Senate. Members who are not judges may be removed through the Governor’s power to suspend public officials in certain instances. The Governor’s power is described in Article IV, section 7. Thus, complaints about the JQC should be directed either to the House of Representatives or the Governor, or to both.


For more information: contact@floridajqc.com

About these ads
, , ,

Subscribe

Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 79 other followers

%d bloggers like this: